A recent ad campaign for a men’s body wash had some people shocked and offended. It made a not-so-subtle play on words by demonstrating its ability to clean sporting equipment, namely, balls. Adult humor rarely shocks or offends me (usually because I’m too busy snickering at it) but I understand people’s objections to the needless sexualization of a toiletry item. I get that it can be offensive to assign sexual meaning where none exists. People do it to each others’ friendships all the time.
The question of whether heterosexual male-female friendships can remain platonic is one that comes up among my married female friends a lot. I think we ask it often because we recognize that these friendships can be so valuable yet the answer can feel so uncertain.
I’ve heard answers ranging from “It’s too dangerous” to “Maybe if you’re moral enough” to “Yes, without question.” Some answers just seem ridiculous: Stuff Christians Like author Jonathan Acuff likes to joke about the side hug, employed to avoid the “risk of two crotches touching” during a heathenly “full-frontal” hug. He’s also written, “When you get married, you’re suddenly thrown into all these awkward opposite sex friendship moments.” Of course, everyone who offers an answer brings with it his or her own experiences. In my experience, marriage hasn’t made opposite-sex friendships awkward; it’s made them better.
Before I was married, my friendships with guys often had a silent question mark hanging above them. Sometimes the question mark was mine; many times it was theirs. But since I’ve been married, there has been no room for iffy punctuation. The ring on my finger has made the firm impression of a period above any mixed-gender friendship. And I think that brings a wonderful freedom to simply be friends.
I became friends with Chris after I got married and before he did. We aren’t friends within a couple; we’re friends in our own right. Our friendship is built on common interests and commitments, some which our spouses share and some which they don’t. We have conversations that our spouses are not part of, and these conversations never border on topics or tones that would be inappropriate. And although we are not couple-friends, we both sincerely like each other’s spouse and desire to become friends with them as well. This desire is not to bring some missing sense of propriety to the friendship but, rather, it is borne out of appreciating each other to the extent that we find value and enjoyment in getting to know the spouse he or she has chosen.
So when people inappropriately sexualize male-female friendships like ours by suggesting that it could be dangerous, I’m taken aback– shocked and offended, even. The idea that men and women can’t enjoy a friendship without fear of becoming lustful is akin to suggesting a person ought not be friends with someone wealthier for fear of becoming envious. Just because there is one required factor present does not mean there’s a full equation.
I’m not naive. I know that some male-female friendships can lead to romantic feelings. But to insist that all are dangerous is to slander the ones that are pure.
When Chris and his wife, Amber, came to visit from New York after five months, the first thing I did when I saw him was give him a great big, full-frontal hug. A side hug would have been an inappropriate welcoming. I was just so happy to see my good friend– sporting equipment was the farthest thing from my mind.






Love this… beautifully expressed, Tamara… and what a delight to hear about such pure and lovely friendship.
My experience is much the same as yours. I honestly didn’t go looking for a male friend, but that’s the way it ended up. I certainly want to be cautious, but it’s caution that I have to watch in ANY close friendship — namely that I don’t become more emotionally involved with this person than my own spouse. I’ve had that with female friends as well and for me, that is my biggest area of weakness. Regardless of their sex, if the first person I want to share good news with is a friend and not my spouse, I know I need to re-evaluate. Not end the friendship, but make sure that my hubby gets some good face time so we can reassert that relationship as the top one.
And yeah, we front hug. ;-D
Great point.
Opposite-sex friendships? Sure, but with a lot of caution. However, the “work spouse” is definitely off limits…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_spouse
That’s just pathetic.
Holy schnikes!
well done.
My thoughts exactly!
Tamara and Chris sittin’ in a tree. (Hahaha)
You better check yo’self before you wreck yo’self.
tacky.
When I think of ‘dangerous’ in this context, dangerous =/= sexualizing the friendship…to me it’s more about the feelings of the spouse. I think it’s perfectly fine as long as it’s full-disclosure (even just “BTW, I spoke with Chris today”). I worry much more about making sure everyone’s on the same page emotionally (“it’s okay to have friends in this capacity”) than worrying that things will get sexual. THAT honestly never enters my mind…I KNOW that won’t happen. But feelings getting hurt? That could happen…easily. And an open line of communication with everyone involved takes that danger away.
JMO (she says with personal experience).
What if you were attracted to your friend?
Would this change your perspective?
I see this type of relationship working only when:
#1- intimate issues are for hubby first and knows when /if you discuss things with friend.
#2- there can be NO attraction on either side.
I absolutely agree with you on #1.
As far as #2, I think this is where the argument can get silly– just as you aren’t going to be attracted to most people you pass on the street, you aren’t going to be attracted to most friends. So it’s not that I disagree with you; it’s that I think it would so rarely be an issue. When it is, then yeah- you need to be careful.
Pingback: “Don’t Be a Dick” and Other Lessons Learned in a Year of Blogging | Tamara Out Loud
Pingback: Saturday Links | The Screaming Kettle